Please sign my Guestbook and leave feedback

Recent Additions

Finchingfield (Essex)

East Haddon (Northants)

Anstey (Hertfordshire)

Gnosall (Staffordshire)

Earl Stonham (Suffolk)

Norton (Suffolk)

Ixworth Thorpe (Suffolk)

Tutbury (Staffordshire)

Nantwich (Cheshire)

Penmon Priory (Anglesey)

Llaneilian (Anglesey)

Llanbadrig (Anglesey)

Lower Peover (Cheshire)

Leverton (Lincolnshire)

Quenington

Dedication : St Swithin     Simon Jenkins: Excluded                               Principal Features: Two Norman Doorways

Quenington Web001

Quenington is in beautiful and deeply rural Cotswold countryside. The church sits proud and loved amongst a prosperous community. As you drive past, frankly, you would hardly give this squat little church a second glance. In which case you would miss out on of the few churches in England to possess two notable Norman doorways.

The church is essentially twelfth century but in truth there is little here to excite you beyond those two doorways. As Pevsner, observed, it was “drastically” restored in 1882, to within an inch of its life, I would say. A north vestry was added and slightly absurd little bell cote plonked on the west end, like piece of lego left over from the wrong set. There is nothing here to shout “Norman” to you although there is a Norman string course on the south side. It is only the two doorways that will set your juices flowing and they are superb.

The interior is pleasant enough. It is very plain but it is inoffensive and light. I am sure that he congregation cherish it and it looks well-tended throughout. Its humdrum nature is brightened only by a display of Norman corbels and carvings that have been set into the nave walls.

I visited here twice in a week near the end of total Covid-19 lockdown. The first time it was locked so I returned on Sunday just as the morning service had finished. The congregation stood chatting around the churchyard, drinking cups

of tea and socialising. I thought at the time, as I am sometimes wont to do, “this is my England”. The people of Quenington were not about to let a worldwide pandemic disturb their sang froid. And it’s about time we got a non-Gallic synonym for that, by the way!

Quenington (2)a
Quenington (4)a
Quenington (16)a

The north doorway. This is the marginally less interesting of the two doorways, although both are splendid. The decoration on the jambs (right upper and lower) is exceptionally elaborate, somewhat unusually outshining the fairly run-of-the-mill decorative courses around the arch. Interestingly, when I read Pevsner I found he  supported my own suspicion (as far as one can confirm these things) that the tympanum - and I also I would suggest the innermost jambs - pre-date the rest of the surround.

Quenington (10)a

The north tympanum is weathered and depicts Jesus slaughtering three meerkats. It is said that he bought insurance from Comparethemarket.com and subsequently realised he could have bought it cheaper elsewhere, and took umbrage. Ok. I made that up. The depiction, in fact, is of the “harrowing of hell”. This is a theologically dodgy notion that between his death on the cross and his resurrection, Christ descended into hell whereupon he granted salvation to virtuous people who had previously died. In the process, of course, he had to slay the odd Devil and Demon as depicted here. The three meerkats, one presumes, are actually tormented souls pleading for salvation. Scriptural references to this incident are oblique, to say the least, and the most positive mention of it was the apocryphal Gospel of Nicodemus (that is to say it was not incorporated into the New Testament) that despite its perceived shortcomings as a narrative was still widely read. How good people landed up in the fiery pit in the first place is a matter of considerable scriptural gymnastics involving both testaments (nothing unusual there) and I am not going to venture into such arcane areas. Without being too cynical, it appears that the early Christian authorities were anxious to fill up the three day gap in Christ’s narrative and this was a convenient and plausible (religiously speaking) answer. The best depiction of the harrowing is on the Norman font at Eardisley in Herefordshire.

Quenington (12)a
Quenington (15)a

Left and Right: Both the north and south capitals of the north doorway have mask figures and interlace designs surmounted by geometrical designs.

Quenington (40)a

The south door does not look to be contemporary with the north. It has virtually no capitals. It has similar broad bands of decoration, however, and a course of beakhead decoration around the tympanum.

Quenington (27)a

The tympanum represents the Coronation of the Virgin. This is, like the harrowing of Hell, a thing of dubious scriptural provenance. Mary is crowned Queen of Heaven by the central figure of Christ. The four evangelists in their winged form can be seen. To the right is a building that Pevsner suggests as the “Heavenly Mansions” or, I would suggest, the City of God. Both, again, Church constructs rather than scriptural. The building with its dome is clearly Byzantine in style, once again suggesting ideas being brought to England by the Crusaders. There is a similar representation on the font at Southrop only four miles away.

Quenington Web030
Quenington Web007

Left: The south doorway with its outer mouldings. Right: Within the church a number of Norman fragments are preserved on the nave walls.

Quenington Web022
Quenington Web023

Left: Looking towards the east end. It is a simple single celled building now, straight through and inoffensively functional. Only the depth of the window splays to left and right betray its Norman origins. Right: The church from the south with its Norman doorway peeking from underneath the porch. Note the Norman string course.

Quenington Web009a
Quenington Web016

Left: The north doorway from the inside. Above: Impost carvings on the north doorway.