Please sign my Guestbook and leave feedback

Recent Additions

Ledsham (Yorkshire)

Whalley (Lancashire)

Tilton-on-the-Hill (Leicestershire)

Gaddesby (Leicestershire)

Hawkchurch (Devon)

Crosscanonby (Cumbria)

Warkworth (Northumberland)

Stone (Buckinghamshire)

Dinton (Buckinghamshire)

Shere (Surrey)

Old Malton Priory

Dedication : All Saints       Simon Jenkins: Excluded                                Principal Features : Transitional West Front;  Misericords

Old Maton Web089

Old Malton is a former priory church and, as was so often the case, had to endure clumsy downsizing that has left it a shadow of its former glory. What we see today is only the nave and south west tower that have survived since the Dissolution of the Monasteries to serve as the parish church. The aisles and chancel are gone. Old Malton serves  as a classic example of the depredations visited on England's monastic churches.

It is too easy to imagine that our monasteries and priories all emerged from a common religious thread. We can all glibly recite the monastic vows of poverty, chastity and obedience. Most of us have picked over the pitiful foundations of once-great monastic foundations and can talk loftily about cloisters and refectories, chapter houses and kitchens. Yet, all monasteries were not alike. There were several colours of monasticism, all with their idiosyncrasies, often in competition with each other, and going in and out of fashion according to the foibles of the King and his great lords.

Old Malton was a Gilbertine house, part of an order founded by Gilbert of Sempringham (Lincolnshire) in 1131. It was the only order initiated in England and had twenty-six houses. It was unique in having "double houses" with both nuns and monks, albeit strictly segregated even within the monastic church. Malton, however, was founded only for monks - more accurately known as "regular canons". The church was started in around 1150. The priory survived until 1539 before succumbing to King Henry's need to top up his coffers. 

The monastic wealth sequestered, it must have been some challenge for the parish to maintain such a church and the choir was quickly demolished. That was just the start of a centuries-long contraction of this once-noble building. The central tower was demolished in 1636. The south aisle is thought to have been lost to fire. In 1732 the north aisle was demolished. This was, as were most Norman priories, a church whose nave was on three levels: arcade, triforium and clerestory. The clerestories were removed and the ceiling of the nave lowered to the level of the triforium. This led to necessary alterations to the noble west front of the church. Two bays of the nave were removed, necessitating a new east wall. If MaltonPrioryChurch had been a horse they would taken it away and shot it to end its suffering.

A west gallery was added in 1800. Like most such galleries it has since been removed. An Early English style triple lancet window was inserted in the east end in 1884. It is now filled in with ghastly rendering: just one more indignity. for a church that had already suffered grievously. Major restoration was carried out in 1877 and in 1959.

Why visit after all this you might be asking? Well this is still a church with a fair amount of architectural interest. The Norman triforium has survived as have the arcades, albeit filled in. Within the precincts of the grounds a late Norman doorway with beakhead decoration has been reconstructed. There is, within the precincts of the nursing home next door, what looks like the original font being used as an enormous flower pot! It is the west front though that is still the glory of this church. Because this was an extraordinary church. It was built, as was the way, from east to west, the east end being of primary importance to the monks. By the time building had reached the west end, Romanesque architecture in Europe was giving way to Gothic.

The west end of this church, therefore, has tall "blind" pointed arches. The west door, however, has a round profile. It has five orders of moulding and five sets of "clasped" pillars on each side. It is, in fact, the very epitome of a "Transitional" doorway bridging the old and new styles. Flamboyant Norman monsters, dragons and chevron mouldings have given way to altogether more formal decoration. There is still a south west tower. Before the depredations it would have had a north west tower as well. With the central tower, also long lost, this would have been a very fashionable west church indeed, very much in the avant garde French Gothic style that in due course was modified into the idiosyncratic Early English style.

Finally, the church has a range of 35 misericords. Sadly, only seven date from the fifteenth century while the other 28 are from Temple Moore's reconstruction in 1880. It is not known whether the mediaeval seats were here originally but since this is a former priory church there is no reason to suppose otherwise. Rather more of a mystery is why Temple Moore took so much trouble to add their Victorian counterparts. The answer is surely that Moore was a devotee of the Gothic Revival and its practitioners were also often "mediaevalists" with a devotion to the quirky art of that era. Moore was not regarded as a member of the Arts & Crafts movement which, coincidentally, began in around 1880 but Moore's new misericords would have very much met with its approval.

There is nothing twee about these more modern creations. With a few exceptions they are mediaeval in subject matter and style. They are not to be despised and Moore or his craftsman surely took inspiration from mediaeval misericords they had seen elsewhere. Moore himself built no fewer than forty churches, of which thirty four are listed by English Heritage, two of them Grade I.. First a pupil and later a collaborator with George Gilbert Scott, he is regarded as one of the “greats” of modern church design.

Old Maton Web001 Old Maton Web002

Left and Right: The Transitional style west door is magnificent. It has the same round profile of the Norman style but just look at the sophistication of the clasped columns and (right) the restrained decoration.

Old Maton Web003 Old Maton Web004

Left: Looking towards the east end. There is no separate chancel, its having being demolished after the Reformation. In place of the filled-in east window is Temple Moore’s ornate altar piece. To north  and south we can see the the original arcades, long since filled in after the demolition of the aisles. Inside each arch space is a faux Norman round-headed window. Right: Looking towards the west end. The perpendicular style west window appears rectangular, but in fact, as you can see in the external pictures it is a normal arched window. When the ceiling was lowered and the clerestories removed the upper part of the window was blocked. The indignities suffered by this church have been endless.

Old Maton Web005
Old Maton Web064

Left: The north east of the church. The triforium can be seen above the arcade, interrupted at this point by the organ. Right: Illumination behind this triforium arch made this a more or less impossible photograph but you can see what a fine feature it was. Triforia had gallery passages running their length. This one was obviously blocked when the aisles were removed. Above it would have been the clerestory. I am not sure I have seen any other church that has been cut off along all three dimensions.

Old Maton Web063
Old Maton Web062

Left and Right: The choirs stalls to the south and north respectively. The stalls are of a piece and so it seems that Temple Moore salvaged the mediaeval ones. I suppose this might account for the question mark over whether they originated from here.

Old Maton Web071 Old Maton Web075

Left: The south side. As you can see, the arcade arches were not sliced in half as you might be forgiven for thinking from the inside. The space between them was simply filled in. The filled in arches are not, again as you might have expected, filled-in clerestory windows - that level of the church has been sliced off completely. These filled-in spaces are actually the back of the triforium where its gallery would have been. Right: Even this Victorian faux Early English lancet window has been filled in.

Old Maton Web083
Old Maton Web087 Old Maton Web072

Left: and Centre: This Norman doorway has been re-erected in the north eastern area of the church. One side has beakhead moulding. There is quite a lot of what seems to be re-cut stonework around it.  The other side is altogether more rustic. Right: The  upper stages of the south-west tower in very early English Gothic styl/ Note the “nook shafts” between the arch spaces and also the decorated string course - a nod to the Norman style that preceded it.

Old Maton Web084
Old Maton Web085

Left and Right: The beakheads. I think it’s pretty obvious that there has been a bit of recutting work done, but on the whole it looks original to me.

The Fifteenth Century Misericords

Old Maton Web028 Old Maton Web056
Old Maton Web029

The misericords at Old Malton are almost unique in England in that they have no “supporters” - that is, smaller designs on both sides of the main motif  see, for example, Ludlow in Shropshire. Ironically, supporters are themselves a unique feature of English misericords! Left: The owl. We tend to cheerfully think of this as a symbol of wisdom, but it has a very much darker meaning in mediaeval iconography. The Mediaeval Bestiaries dwell on the owl as a bird that prefers darkness to light and use it as a symbol of the Jews who rejected Christ. That seems a bit harsh to me, given that all His earliest followers were by definition also Jews but I guess that finer point of history was lost on our mediaeval forebears. Centre: The eagle. Again the Bestiary illuminates us. The eagle can look straight at the Sun as Jesus was capable of looking God in the face, we are told, and he could fly close the Sun in order to burn off his old feathers - symbolising the ability of man to to renew himself by looking to God. Right: The Griffin with the body of a lion and the wings and head of an eagle. My Bestiary says simply that if a Griffin (or Gryphon) sees a man he will attack him. It was synonymous with the Devil

Old Maton Web025
Old Maton Web053 Old Maton Web054

Left: A Hare or a Rabbit. It could be a symbol of fertility, given the rabbit’s proverbial ability to breed! The hare, however, is described in the Bestiary as being “timid and fleet of foot”. This was seen as synonymous with men who “trust not themselves but in the Creator”. That seems to me to be the more likely explanation since the Church at the time was still a bit ambivalent about all that reproduction jive. Sex, eh? Sinful. Centre: The Lion. The King of the Beasts and, therefore, representative of God. Right: The Camel. Well it’s a bit out of proportion but this is, I think you will agree, a pretty good representation. The Church Guide puts it well: “Christ is the spiritual camel, for as the camel lies down to receive its load, so he humbled Himself to bear the sins of the world.

Old Maton Web027 Old Maton Web033 Old Maton Web032

Left: The Pineapple. The Church Guide points out that Columbus brought the pineapple back to Europe in 1492 (from Guadeloupe) and was the “ultimate exotic fruit”  and a favourite motif of architects. I’m not sure how that squares with these being fifteenth century misericords. Our carver would have had to have been very well-informed. It’s interesting too that this is the only one of this set of misericords that is not a Bestiary figure. Centre and Right: The mediaeval misericords are at the back of the seating ranges. The stalls are also much older here and have the traditional carvings of beasts. 

The Victorian Misericords

Old Maton Web008
Old Maton Web013 Old Maton Web009
Old Maton Web006

The Victorian misericords are not to be despised. Temple Moore went to some considerable trouble to commission or execute themes that would not have been out of place on mediaeval misericords. They are mostly carvings of fantastic beasts with a couple of rural scenes for good measure. It is the dress of the men that give the game away in terms of their age. Perhaps wisely, he refrained from reproducing scenes from domestic life - women clumping their husbands with ladles and so on. I will only elaborate on those with particular meaning or interest.

Old Maton Web012 Old Maton Web007 Old Maton Web014 Old Maton Web059

Left: Joshua and Caleb with grapes. Second Left: Bear baiting, Second Right: A man fighting a lion with sword and shield. Right: I’m particularly fond villainous-looking tumbler in the guise of...a fox?. Don’t you just love his clothes? He’s a real pantomime character.

Old Maton Web021 Old Maton Web023 Old Maton Web051 Old Maton Web048

Left: The Church Guide describes this as “Devil with money bags in a chest”. I suppose the wings created  that interpretation. Or does a miser turn a man into a Devil? It’s an interesting one and perhaps we need to remind ourselves that this is a Victorian carver, not a mediaeval one. Second Left: The deadly sin of Gluttony. Second Right: A green man.  Right: The Church Guide suggests this is a “grimacer with an ass’s ears. The man is pulling a face. In fact, it seems to me that the man’s head is actually being bitten by another creature. Is that a pair of eyes above his head.

Old Maton Web020
Old Maton Web046 Old Maton Web011 Old Maton Web010

Left: The Church Guide reckons this to be “a devil in bondage with hand covering face. Well it might be a devil if you take the horns to be an infallible guide.

Old Maton Web049 Old Maton Web017
Old Maton Web022 Old Maton Web015

Left: An angel holding a heart, according to the Church Guide. Whose heart, one wonders?

Old Maton Web079
Old Maton Web080

This fine font is in the grounds of an adjacent nursing home. I suppose most people wouldn’t have our chutzpah and wouldn’t put their snouts round the corner and then have the further nerve to go and investigate what they see. It’s obviously a church font. The top decorated band looks newer than the rest which looks as if it could be Norman. being adjacent to a Norman priory that has acquired a gothic font this is totally plausible. Does anyone out there have any information?




Please leave feedback in my Guestbook