The rest of the church - apart from the tower - is adorned with plain, unbattlemented parapets.
I have at the time of writing been unable to gain access to the interior of the church. Although I like to analyse or speculate on the program of work that the masons were undertaking when the sculptural decoration was added this has proved impracticable here so I am going to confine myself to observations on that alone.
There are two discrete pieces of decoration here: on the south porch and clerestory and on the south aisle west of the tower. The sub-parapet cornice frieze of the aisle is very clearly by the same mason or masons who carved similar friezes at Cottesmore and Hungarton and probably on the tower frieze at Harlaxton. It is a primitive style typical of the man I named “Simon Cottesmore” .His presence is demonstrated by, amongst other things, the “bat winged lion”, identical to those at Hungarton and Cottesmore. Th presence of a flea carving denotes the presence of John Oakham. A mooning man announces that the work was under the auspices of the Mooning Men Group of contracting masons.
The porch carvings, however are in distinctly different in style. The inset almond shaped eyes of the aisle and clerestory are replaced by drilled eyes and an altogether fiercer set of grotesques. As with Cottesmore and Hungarton,I suspect that John Oakham contributed to friezes largely by Simon Cottesmore. I think, though, that the porch here was possibly by John alone.
|